AI FOR GOOD

Community · Read, check, decide

Claim Check Board

Check each claim in a notice against six source cards. Select a claim, read the highlighted cards, then place it in a bin.

Fictional notice and sources

The notice

Willow Lane Tool Library

The notice has no date. All six source cards belong to this exercise.

    0 of 7 claims classified

    Where does it belong?

    Six source cards

    Cards marked “Relevant” speak to the selected claim. Open any card to read it.

    No source is not the same as a source that disagrees. A source can mention a topic and still leave evidence missing.

    Run this activity

    Presenter · 4 minutes

    1. Read claim 2 and find source B together. Explain why the claim is contradicted.
    2. Check claim 5. A session record does not establish who attended.
    3. Ask for a hands-up vote on claim 4, then reveal the prepared check.

    Pairs · 15 minutes

    1. Pick a claim and find the source that speaks to it.
    2. Choose a bin. Write one sentence on paper naming your source and reason.
    3. Compare with a neighbor. Name the extra evidence needed to settle missing claims.

    No devices: Print or read the notice and six cards. Write S, M or C beside each claim with a source letter. Vote by hands.

    Debrief: Which claims were hardest to place? When is “no evidence” the honest answer? What should the library add to its notice?

    Check your reasoning: Name one claim with missing evidence and one contradicted by a source. Explain the difference.

    Prompt to reuse

    For each claim, find the sources that speak to it. Decide: Supported, Missing evidence (the available sources do not establish the claim), or Contradicted (a source says something different). Write the reason in one sentence naming the source.

    Sources and attribution

    Concept by Claude Sonnet 5.5; built by Codex. The page makes no AI calls.